Everything
Some people need to learn when to shut up, including royals. Courtesy of his candid confessions in his memoir, Spare, about using illicit substances, Prince Harry might have stirred more than just media buzz—they’ve sparked some serious political commentary too.
In Spare, Prince Harry thought it wise to not only reveal the inner workings of his family but also share with the world his experiences with substances like marijuana, cocaine, and psychedelic drugs. When it came to light, the revelation came under fire, particularly from conservative circles, who argued that this should affect his immigration status if the government shifts. The Heritage Foundation has even pushed for court actions to disclose how the U.S. has handled his admissions legally.
So if Trump should win the next election, the Prince and wife Meghan Markle might be finding themselves back in the arms of merry old England before they know it. Awkward.
For now, however, the Prince is apparently safe reports Daily Beast. Turns out being rich, white and (en)titled really does get you far in the USA. According to an interview with the American ambassador, it seems Harry’s past won’t affect his residency under the current administration, despite the usual strict barriers against drug admissions for U.S. immigrants.
The recent remarks made by Ambassador Jane Hartley have added fuel to the fire, stating bluntly that deportation “is not going to happen in the Biden administration.” This announcement, bold and somewhat unusual, suggests a protective stance over Harry by the current U.S. leadership, regardless of his past.
This saga draws a stark contrast to British culinary queen Nigella Lawson, who faced U.S. entry denial over her own drug use admissions back in 2013. The juxtaposition between Lawson’s and Harry’s experiences underscores a potential inconsistency in how these rules apply depending on one’s profile in the public, the media, and political connections.
But then again, doesn’t that just sum up the legal system at large any way?
